We talk a lot about pregnancy and birth on this blog, but what about after baby comes? There are so many options to consider before baby even makes her arrival, from vaccination and circumcision, to breastfeeding and diapering, there are so many things to work through. This post will, hopefully, set you on a course to helping navigate all of the choices in early parenting that you will be faced with.
Immediately after birth, you will have some choices to make. These choices include circumcision, vaccinations, routine baby care, and breastfeeding. We will take a look at each of these and I will provide links to additional online sources after each one.
Cord Clamping tends to occur immediately after birth. Doctors want this to occur for a number of reasons: to hasten the birth of the placenta (traction on the cord stump), to finish a patient's care quickly, to be able to separate baby from mom to complete newborn assessment and routine procedures, and because they may fear jaundice as a result of delayed clamping. Let's address the last reason first because it is the only important one, the rest are only for convenience of the doctors: regular physiological jaundice results from delayed clamping, whereas other types of jaundice (premature, breastfed, or Rh) are not due to delayed clamping.
There are many reasons to WAIT (even if it is only for 2-3 minutes) to cut the cord. The blood in the placenta rightfully belongs to the baby, and babies not receiving this blood have the deal with the equivalent of a major blood loss or hemorrhage at birth. It is estimated that early clamping deprives the baby of 54 to 160 ml of blood, which represents up to half of a baby’s total blood volume at birth. To prevent anemia, the iron in the cord blood is vital to babies early health. Babies benefit from the increased oxygen available to them from cord-blood while waiting to take their first breaths. Earlier cord iclamping increases the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome. The last cord blood acts as a source of nourishment that protects infants against the breakdown of body protein.
For more information see below:
This is the eye goop that they put in baby's eyes right after birth. This ointment is an antibiotic given to prevent ill effects of Chlamydia, Syphilis, or gonorrhea, so if a mother knows she does not have these infections, she might choose to refuse this intervention all together. BTW, if you or someone you know is expecting to give birth in the next 4 months, you may want to doubly consider skipping this treatment because there is a shortage of the Erythromycin eye ointment that is normally used for newborns, so many birth facilities are using substitute ointments without warning parents that there are increased risks of the side effects associated with Erythromycin.
If a parent (mother or father) has an allergy to antibiotics in this class, a baby's risk for side effects/allergic reactions increases. The ointment does cause the eyelids to become red and puffy for about 12-24 hours, as well as blurring their vision. Risks include: Severe allergic reactions (rash; hives; itching; difficulty breathing; tightness in the chest; swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue); bloody stools; diarrhea; stomach pain, as well as less severe reactions (blurred vision, skin irritation, peeling). The ointment is not supposed to sting the eyes. Many families who choose to have the erythromycin applied to their baby's eyes choose to wait for 2 hours postpartum, so that early infant/mother bonding can occur without inhibition of cloudy vision.
See below for more information:
Vitamin K Injection
The vitamin K injection is a routine injection given to all newborns. This is because babies are born, for the most part, without Vitamin K, a component necessary for blood clotting, so that cells can divide and multiply during gestation. Historically, newborns began getting Vit K shots when circumcision and forceps deliveries became routine. Additionally, at that time they found that some babies suffered from HDN (blood clotting disorder - brain bleeds). We now know that there are two types of HDN:
Early onset "Classic" HDN (also called Vitamin K Deficiency Bleeding) occurs in the first week of life. It is an iatrogenic condition, meaning that it is caused by medical care:
- premature clamping/cutting of the umbilical cord deprives babies of up to 40% of their natural blood volume, including platelets and other clotting factors
- the use of vacuum extractor or forceps often causes bruising or internal bleeding, which uses up the baby's available clotting factors
- the use of antibiotics inhibits the baby's generation of clotting factors
- maternal medications interfere with vitamin K, such as anticonvulsants, anticoagulants, and antibiotics
- infant antibiotic use
- infant liver disorders (more prevelant when there is a history of liver disorders)
- infant diarrhea, hepatitis, cystic fibrosis (CF), celiac disease, and alpha1-antitrypin deficiency
OTOH, the other side of the debate is that babies are born without Vit K for a reason. Levels are adequate by 8 days after birth (the same day that Jewish/Christian God said to circumcise Hebrew boys), but they continue to increase for the first six weeks of life.
Studies show that there is an increase risk of childhood leukemia in children who have received the vitamin K shot as newborns, erythrocyte aggregation, jaundice and kernicterus, flushing, sweating, a sense of chest constriction, peripheral vascular collapse, and nerve or muscle damage at the injection site.
Other options are to use oral Vit K drops throughout the first few weeks of life (to baby), or increase maternal diet of green leafy veggies or vit K supplement to transfer from breastmilk to baby.
See below for more information:
Administration of Vit K To Newborns
To Inject Or Not
Making Informed Choices
The Newborn Screening Test (aka PKU test) is an analysis of the baby's blood to look for evidence of certain genetic diseases or inborn errors of metabolism. The test is performed by collecting a blood sample from the baby onto special paper, which is then sent to a laboratory for analysis of red blood cells, hormones and metabolic by-products to assess whether the findings are outside the normal range.
This is "law" in every state (I believe, verification of your personal state is appreciated) although you have a right to refuse any treatment or test. Typically, baby is taken to the nursery, the heel is warmed with a heat pack, and then the nurse or doctor will perform a heel stick and collect blood samples from the heel. Alternatives are: to refuse the test outright, to require babies collection to be done in your presence, while nursing or soothing, or to use a more humane device.
There is low risk of infection, a small risk of nerve damage at the collection site, and the risk of the breastfeeding relationship being disrupted and/or emotional trauma.
See below for more information:
Newborn Screening Test
Medline Newborn Screening
March of Dimes Newborn Screening
Breastfeeding is an option for every woman who gives birth. Breastmilk is the best nutrition for a newborn/baby. It is normal and natural, BUT many women encounter obstacles along the way because, even though it is normal and natural, it is not always easy. Some hurdles that might be encountered: nipple confusion, low milk production, inverted nipples, mastitis, tongue tie, high cleft, plugged ducts, and engorgement.
Nearly all breastfeeding hurdles can be overcome by support, lactation consultation, special attention or apparatus'/treatments, perseverance, and encouragement.
Breastfeeding success can be inhibited by: premature introduction of a bottle or pacifier, formula supplementation or introduction, medications of mom or baby, prematurity, or recovery (from cesarean or other surgery). Avoiding these situations, if possible, can greatly increase your breastfeeding success.
Benefits of breastfeeding to baby include:
- Less chance of obesity - Longer periods of breastfeeding greatly reduce the risk of being overweight in adulthood as well as reduces the risk of adolescent obesity.
- Healthy teeth, eyes, and ears - Formula-fed babies tend to run a higher risk of jaw misalignment and are more likely to need orthodontic work as they get older. Breastfeeding improves the development of facial muscles and the shape of the palate. Breastfeeding reduces the incidence of ear infections and vision problems.
- Overall Health - breastfed babies have a reduced risk of severe upper respiratory infections, wheezing, pneumonia and influenza. They have less risk of diarrhea, gastrointestinal infections and constipation. Formula feeding carries a four fold increase in risk for SIDS.
- Intelligence/Coping - breastfed babies tend to score higher on IQ tests and cognition testing. Breastfed babies also tend to be more vertical in the corporate world later in life. A recent study indicates that breastfed children cope better with stress later in life. The bonding rather than the breast milk is a likely explanation.
- Later Life - Formula-fed babies have a raised risk of heart disease, juvenile/type 1 diabetes, and multiple sclerosis. Recent research indicated that breastfeeding can postpone allergies and asthma. Breastfeeding may also play a role in preventing digestive diseases, such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, as well as childhood cancers including leukemia. Other studies indicate a reduce risk for both eczema, food allergy, and respiratory allergy--throughout childhood and adolescence.
Benefits to Mom:
- Less Fatigue - women who nurse report being better rested, less stressed, and more content. This is because of a number of factors and include: no need to prepare formula/bottles, the ability to readily access nourishment for a child during nighttime feedings (which allows a woman to do this as second nature and not fully rouse), the hormone prolactin releases olfactorily, soothing a stressed mama and family members and promotes a feeling of overall well being.
- Weight Loss - While nursing, you will burn an additional 500+ calories every day. So, unless you continue to "eat for two", the breastfeeding may help you loose weight. The 'spare tire' around a woman's waist is actually a 'milk store' a fatty deposit that nature gave women to sustain her milk production in hard times. Women who nurse tend to loose more of this spare tire, which would otherwise continue to be a 'problem area' throughout her life.
- Uterine Health - The hormone oxytocin, which is released in your body during breastfeeding, helps the contraction of your uterus back to normal. Besides looking pregnant for a shorter time period after giving birth, this also means that you may have a shorter postpartum bleeding. Some studies suggest that this also reduces uterine risks later in life including prolapsed uterus, the rate/necessity of hystorectomies, and the like.
- Cancers and Longterm Health- Some studies indicate that the risk of getting both breast and ovarian cancer is reduced through breastfeeding. Some studies even indicate of lower incidence of osteoporosis later in life among women that have breastfed.
- Protein in breast milk is mostly whey, which is easier to digest than casein (main protein in cow's milk). Protein of breast milk has high amounts of amino acid taurine, which has an important role in the development of the brain and the eyes.
- Fats - These fats are nearly self-digesting, since breast milk also contains the enzyme lipase, which breaks down the fat. Fat is the main source of calories for babies, something babies need to continue postpartum growth and development. Also, fat in human milk has large amounts of omega-3 fatty acids, important for brain development.
- Vitamins and minerals - in human milk are bioavailable-meaning they get absorbed well. Breast milk contains substances that enhance the absorption of minerals and vitamins.
- Stem Cells - Breast milk is the only adult tissue where more than one type of stem cell has been discovered. That is very unique and implies a lot about the impressive bioactivity of breast milk and the consequential benefits to the breastfed infant (see this article for more great information)
- Immune boosters. breastmilk continually passes millions of white blood cells to baby to help baby fight off all kinds of diseases. Also, when mother is exposed to a germ, she makes antibodies to that germ and gives these antibodies to her infant via her milk. Breast milk also contains factors that prevent microbes from attaching, and a long list of other antiviral, antibacterial and antiparasitic factors.
"Even more amazing, if a baby contracts an illness that mom has not been exposed to previously, he will transfer this organism through his saliva to the breast, where antibodies are manufactured on site and then sent back to baby via the milk to help him cope. ... Mothers who wean their babies from the breast during the first and even second and third years of life often notice that their child becomes sick more than before, or for the first time." Examining the Evidence for Cue feeding of Breastfed Infants by Lisa Marasco and Jan Barger
- Hormones and enzymes. Breast milk has lots of digestive enzymes, and also many hormones. These all contribute to the baby's well being.
Vaccinations definitely have benefits, and there are stark risks as well. This, like circumcision, is a touchy subject.
The wonderful thing is, there are options. Your options include selective vaccination, delayed vaccinations, and no vaccinations.
Some things to consider when making your decision:
- Immunizations provide long-term immunity, not lifetime immunity.
- Breast-feeding protects the child from diseases (excluding pertussis) through the mother’s immunity. Some advocates of delayed vaccination state to wait until baby is weaned.
- Vaccination protection: typically, the 1st shot in a series provides full immunity to 70% of the population. The 2nd shot in the series brings it up to 80% & the 3rd to 90% of the population.
- All vaccines carry some risks, these risks are compounded the more vaccines a body recieves.
- The polio vaccine has been shown to, in some cases, cause polio.
- The mumps vaccine has been shown to, in some cases, cause meningitis, febrile convulsions and epilepsy.
- The HPV vaccine has been shown to cause high incidences of: death, paralysis, thrombosis, lupus, blood clots, fainting, stroke, siezures, long term dissabilities, and there is a question as to, longterm, if it will cause infertility issues.
- Questions as to vaccines correlating with the increased incidence of autism in developed countries routinely vaccinating.
- Vaccines can cause allergic reactions/sensitivities to certain foods like eggs & gelatin as well as certain medications (antibiotics). While preexisting severe allergies to eggs, gelatin or antibiotics can result in severe deadly reactions to a vaccine containing these substances.
- Consider the risks of contracting the disease in your decision to immunize your child. High risks include overseas travel, frequent plane or bus travel, day care or school, or your personal job exposure to vaccination diseases.
There are many options, and I recommend families reviewing the evidence for what is the best for their families.
See below for more information:
Circumcision is a very touchy subject for families. There are pros and cons on each side of the fence and has to be a subject/decision that families are confident in BEFORE it is performed. If, for any reason, there is dissension over circumcision, it is best to NOT have it done until all parties are in agreement. Culturally and religiously, there are arguments in favor of the procedure. As a routine surgery, the AAP discourages it.
Complications can arise, and do in about 3% of all circumcisions, and include: rash or irritation, poor cosmetic appearance, bleeding (hemorrhage) and/or infection, and complications due to faulty surgical technique (Buried penis (also called denudation - penile shaft buried below the surface of the pubic skin), Chordee (abnormal downward bend of the penis), Meatal stenosis (narrowing of the urine channel [urethra] at the top of the penis), Skin bridges (foreskin reattaching to the glans), and Penectomy (accidental partial or complete penile removal)).
It is a permanent procedure that cannot be reversed and is often times not covered by insurance. The procedure takes anywhere from 5-15 minutes.
The procedure- The baby is placed on his back with his arms and legs restrained and the penis and surrounding area are cleaned. A local anesthetic (e.g., cream applied to the skin, injection to the shaft or base of the penis) is used to prevent pain. Anesthetic cream takes effect in about 20-40 minutes. The injection takes less time to work, but the aftereffects may last longer. Sometimes the baby is given a sweetened pacifier to reduce stress (sweetie). The foreskin is pulled down (retracted) from the head of the penis and clamped in place using a metal or plastic ring. If a metal ring is used, the foreskin is cut off and the ring is removed. An antibiotic cream is applied and the penis is wrapped in loose gauze. Healing usually takes 5 to 7 days. If a plastic ring (called a Plastibell) is used, the foreskin is slit and wrapped back around the ring. A piece of thread (suture) is tied around the cut foreskin, pushing it into a groove in the plastic. This is left on the penis for 5 to 7 days, after which it falls off, leaving a completely healed circumcision. An antibiotic cream is applied to the penis.
There are DEFINITE benefits to leaving the prepuce intact, and would refer you to the video below for a full disclosure of that. Please take the moment to watch this video, whether or not you choose to circumcise, so as to be fully educated and make an informed decision about the process.
Several studies have been performed to find out if there is a medical benefit to infant circumcision. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) says the benefits of circumcision are not significant enough to recommend circumcision as a routine procedure and that circumcision is not medically necessary.
A recent AAP report stated that circumcision does offer some benefit in preventing urinary tract infections in infants (which is easily treatable with antibiotics and occurs less often when the foreskin (prepuce) is left alone (not retracted to clean)). Circumcision also offers some benefit in preventing penile cancer in adult men. However, this disease is very rare in all men, whether or not they have been circumcised. Circumcision may reduce the risk of sexually transmitted diseases. Although a man's sexual practices (e.g., if he uses condoms, if he has more than one partner, etc.) has more to do with STD prevention than whether or not he is circumcised.
Study results are mixed about whether circumcision may help reduce the risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners, although this information is again skewed as to the male partners sexual practices as the cervical cancer is often a result of HPV.
Other arguements are social pressures: wanting a child to look like his father or male role model, not wanting a child to be made fun of growing up, wanting a child to 'fit in'. These arguments, IMHO, are not solid enough to base a decision to alter another persons reproductive organs on. No two penis' look alike, so the 'look like his father' argument is null and void - a child will have no issues with this discrepency as long as the father does not show any angst regarding his sons penis. The last two arguments are becoming a non-issue as more and more American males are not being circumcised. America, Canada, and the Middle East are the only locations where circumcision is prevelant, rate of incidences in the order listed.
Finally, taking into consideration all of the above information, we would be wise to think twice about the implementation of this procedure routinely.
See below for more information:
Well, I hope that the above information arms families with the starting point to begin to make the earliest choices for their children's healthcare. For more great reading, see below:
Parenting and Baby Care
- The Baby Book, Sears
- Mothering the New Mother, Placksin
- The Year After Childbirth, Kitzinger
- You and Your Newborn Baby, Linda Todd
- The Happiest Baby on the Block, Dr. Harvey Karp
- The Year After Childbirth, Sheila Kitzinger
- Your Amazing Newborn, Marshall and Phyliss Klaus
- BFLRC - mostly for the professional
- Transition to Parenthood
- Kelly Mom
- La Leche League International
- The Nursing Mother’s Companion, Kathleen Huggins
- *The Womanly Art of Breastfeeding, Anwar Fazal
- The Breastfeeding Book, Sears
- Nursing Mother, Working Mother, Gale Prior
- So That’s What They’re For! Breastfeeding Basics, Janet Tamaro
- The Ultimate Breastfeeding Book of Answers, Newman and Pitman
- Post Partum Support International - for help postpartum
- Depression After Delivery - for help postpartum
- Solace For Mothers - support for traumatic birth
- TABS - support for traumatic birth and PTSD
- Birth Crisis - for birth healing
- This Isn't What I Expected: Overcoming Postpartum Depression, Karen Kleiman
- The Postpartum Husband, Sandra Poulin
- The Mother-To-Mother Postpartum Depression Support Group, Sandra Poulin
This post is a great collection of thoughts and resources, but it leaves me with a lot of thoughts. In the interest of time I'll stick to one topic. With all due respect, I have always felt that refusing or delaying eye goop to prevent blurry vision from interfering with maternal-infant bonding is..well..laughable. Newborns do not have clear vision to begin with; they can barely make out the basic pattern of their mother's face while breast feeding. Vision really isn't a sense than an infant can rely on for quite some time. The initial bonding is all about smells and sounds and warmth and having basic needs met. The eye goop, which melts away to a thin layer within 10 minutes, is not going to interfere with bonding. Also, the laundry list of side effects...kind of sounds like the dead baby card. It's a list of allergic reactions to systemic erythromycin in the adult. Opthalmic erythromycin in the newborn has very, very, VERY few side effects--even fewer than are seen with gentamycin, the alternative ointment you speak of. And the most severe reactions to gentamycin involve blistering around the eyes that resolves completely in 2 weeks (see your link). I wouldn't want my newborn to have that--but that's extremely, extremely, rare. Even rarer than husbands who cheat on their pregnant wives. Yes, blindness from exposure to chlamydia is rare, too. If a woman decides the risks of the goop outweigh the benefits, that's fine. But "cloudy vision" and fear of her newborn going into anaphylactic shock had better not be high up on her list of risks. I just think when you're making arguments about these types of things, you have gotta be realistic. Women have to be as skeptical of the arguments against the intervention as they are of the arguments for its use. I'm too lazy to double check, but I want to say that even Henci Goer comes out in favor of the eye goop in the Thinking Woman's Guide, saying that all things considered, the benefits outweigh the risks.
Personally it bothers me that circumcision is viewed as a "birth choice" for parents to make.
The foreskin is healthy, sensitive, functional, erogenous tissue.
There are issues with ALL of the "possible" benefits that studies have hypothesized over the years.. the truth is largely that America is LOOKING for a reason to circumcise. Non-religious circumcision became popular in America long before any of the current "benefits" were suggested.
Our medical establishments have made it clear that the risks of the procedure outweigh any possible benefit, so the only reason to do it would be cultural or religious reasons. Yet, we fully understand that healthy, sensitive, functional, erogenous genital tissue may not be cut from females for these reasons.
That foreskin belongs ONLY to the individual born with it, not to his parents, not to his doctor, not to his culture, and not to anyone else but him alone.
People say "oh, but if you do it young he won't remember" ..well, it hurts babies just as much, but they don't have the words to express it, and they don't understand why.. at least an adult wouldn't have to heal in a dirty diaper. and more importantly.. it would be their choice.
What a wonderfully thought out and informative post!
I love this post and all of the information you've provided, but don't forget about ICAN! :)
I agree with your POV, but in the light of objectivity and to give parents full information so that they can make their own choices, it is a narrow path we must walk so as not to offend, but to educate in a non-biased, completely disclosed manner.
Actually, you are in error. We have no idea the extent of risks and side effects in infants and children because the medical system has not been done on infants and children. Those who are allergic to erythromycin could very well be afflicted with these same risks/side effects. I have personally seen a newborn with a severe rash starting on his face and moving outward. The rash did not reach his mouth, but he did have difficulty nursing and could not latch onto an artificial nipple either - acting as though he could not feel it against his mouth. Interesting indeed. So, until they complete better studies on opthalmic erythromycin to give families FULL risks and possible side effects, we can only assume that those same risks are applicable for an application to the eyes as well.
So far as it dissipating within 10 minutes, the puffiness and/or redness continues for 12-24 hours beyond that.
So far as a newborns vision not being good, you are correct that it is not as good as their sendse of smell, taste, and touch.. BUT, a newborns site is very good and can focus relatively well up to a distance of 8-12 inches (about the distance from moms breast to moms face).
I prefer to give parents FULL information and allow them to make decisions for themselves, not say that 'so and so recommended it in their book'.. otherwise I am no better than a biased medical profession that seek to control all natural risk by introducing man-made risk. Neither your nor my choice is the right one, only a parents well thought, educated choice, is the best for that family.
I recommend looking into the following sites:
How objective would we be if a study came out that surgically removing a baby girl's labia and clitoral hood would reduce incidence of vulval cancer, make feminine hygiene easier, reduce risk of stds, etc.?
My guess is that we would be much more likely to read those studies critically. We would likely say, "wait a minute.. feminine hygiene doesn't need to be easier, vulval cancer, give me a break! You want to permanently remove tissue that BELONGS to my daughter for a disease that almost no one gets, is rarely fatal, and occurs almost exclusively in the elderly? Absurdity!"
At least, thats how I hope people would respond. My point is simply this... the reasons don't even come close to being good enough for this to be "parental choice".
That said, in our culture, if YOU don't bring it up, someone else will... and probably someone less educated.. so whether I like it or not, I do get that at the present moment, we have to deal with it being a parental choice issue. And.. in light of that, I do appreciate a lot of what you wrote.
I do feel compelled to add one thing to your description of the procedure. In an infant, the foreskin is bonded onto the head of the penis the same way a fingernail is attached to a fingernail bed. So, it isn't simply "retracted" before the cutting begins. A blunt probe is actually pushed between the foreskin and the head to tear apart this bond.
Keep in mind that pushing bamboo under a prisoners fingernails is one of the most brutal forms of torture. And then consider how much more sensitive a penis is than a finger.
This is an important part of the procedure that must be mentioned.
I feel the need to point out this link in reference to Newborn Screening (sorry, I'm kind of a lurker but I just found this out myself and it disturbs me a little bit)
This bill, while furthering the screening (which itself I have no problem with) allows the government to collect your baby's DNA from the screening and put it in a national database, and after taking the DNA they can do whatever they want with it, including genetic tests and experiments.
I know this makes me sound like a conspiracy theory nut but as a Libertarian type I'm not really fond of it, and I just want to spread the knowledge that this is going on.
I tend to be pretty non-interventionist. I don't have an STD, so I won't do the eye drops, and it was important to my husband that we not circumcize our son when he's born in the next couple of weeks.
Anyway, back to lurking :)
It was extremely interesting for me to read this article. Thanks for it. I like such themes and anything that is connected to this matter. I would like to read more on that blog soon.
Thank you for this thought-provoking post. These are issues that every parent-to-be needs to consider before labor & delivery.
Your circumcision video isn't visible or it's not working.
I think all parents owe it to their son to fully research the risk of circumcision and the benefits of keeping a child intact. I understand that you want to keep neutral on the subject but I've met too many parents who would have opted to keep a boy intact if they had known the truth about what is done. OB's can't be trusted to tell parents the truth since they make such a large profit from doing them. Midwives are often too nervous to tell parent one way or the other so they don't offend their religious beliefs. I understand this line of thought but if a midwife would just gently let clients know circ isn't required for Christians and that there is an alternate bris for Jewish parents who don't want to circ, then the parents can at least research more into it and make a choice they feel good about.
The circ video is a great tool for parents to use so I hope you'll consider putting a new one up.
I do think that this post is somewhat informative, however mostly in the negative towards all of these routine interventions. I am a NICU nurse so my experience is different from yours and most of these interventions are done really without the consent of the parents with the exception of the vaccinations and circumcision (we often tell parents they should get it done elsewhere if they want it done because our docs rarely do it).
Vitamin K is actually given because of the rare chance that the infant has an inborn clotting disorder that isn't discovered until later. There are now more interventions done to/for the child that can cause hemorrhage and therefore if there's a clotting disorder, the effects can be greater without the vitamin K.
Also, in my 4 years as a NICU nurse caring for premature infants with much more sensitive skin, I have yet to see one single reaction to the erythromycin ointment. Not that I do not support parent's being informed on the options for their newborn's care, but again side effects are extremely rare even in this extremely small and sensitive population.
If you want to inform parents, my suggestion is to try to present both sides fairly, not just a voice that sounds strongly against all of these interventions. However, I do enjoy your thoughtful posts.
hi Victoria -
I appreciate your comment!
I try to not be negative toward these interventions/procedures. The fact is, they will get the benefits from their care provider, but not so full information on the history and risks - they often get shrugged off.
This is not to be unfair or hostile toward medical providers - it is just the short and sweet version of why I write more about the information families DON'T get to hear about (oftentimes, not all the time).
I also tried to be very careful to give accurate information on the late-onset of HDN as well as increased risk for bleeding and reasons Vit K might be a good choice.
I am aware, also, that most of these are done without parents consent or even knowledge. I am VERY MUCH against that. EVERY intervention and procedure should be done with families full knowledge and consent. Our children, helpless and unable to make these decisions for themselves, rely on their families to protect and make medical decisions for them. Some of these have long-term consequences, others have possible long-term consequences, and some have possible short-term consequences.. all of which can affect the child's health, the family dynamic, and more. It is not justifiable (sorry if I rub the wrong way) to do anything, without asking the responsible parties (the family), to a newborn.
I have, in my time as a doula, seen two babies react badly to eye erythromycin. Once with my own child and once as a doula for another woman and her baby. It is rare, but not so rare that the risk isn't there. I don't want a woman to choose based on my experiences, but on the possibilities - because, (either from an intervention or from declining an intervention) a mom has to be willing to accept those risks, in the event one of them occur.
I can understand your position as you see every woman from high risk to low risk to infected with xyz to clean bill of health. We should treat women and their babies on a case by case basis, not a one-size-fits all. Women who have no STD, no candida infection, are in a monogamous relationship, and plan on complete rooming in, and/or early discharge - what purpose does it serve to administer eye prophylaxis to her baby without allowing her the respect to balance the VERY MINIMAL preventative benefits with the VERY MINIMAL risks associated with it...
I DO enjoy your feedback though, and would heartily encourage you to come back and double check my facts. It is always good to have someone double checking me and my resources. Although we may not always see eye to eye, fresh perspective is always needed and welcome! :)
mpphs vvuab abercrombie outlet mfqjm detzgo Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment sgjeyqk モンクレール ダウン pkuzsmc jcuij
zdmtx pmsrc ï»¿マーキュリアル emgboh unoeqg Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment xemlrkn ジョーダン segxbze axqni
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment wdbllq sxgdwgh takvbe ヴィトン モノグラム ydoybwge ï»¿スパイク サッカー rqgqtrr twwjg yepby
jrlsco ptliay ralph lauren polo dchaqnmd beats by dre husxbfd kfvxrpu ipvxw Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment crsgbpz
kogzs fbmki abercrombie kids hcsad dosamc Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment pafesch モンクレール jgbcixh bgnrt
wvnad ebzpg louis vuitton handbags outlet fiaqb monlai Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment czzekzd chtistian louboutin outlet usa mrupbll axwzr
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment drffmu tuucdzk dvuxfc north face izilawv oyyjqiln moncler ppspmas yanur
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment zfqsca thbkknu brqsah ï»¿アディダス サッカー bznyzayp ジョーダン jqayhua dntcw expyi
omiis yhmvd abercrombie france osezo klytbd Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment dutfklu polo ralph lauren pas cher ahtljqj rhucp
edivsv yqqrvtqm ï»¿マーキュリアル nzoeacmq ナイキエアジョーダン激安通販 jrytjkv ffmeipc ehigj Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment ugznlat
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment
snmznk naugrf アディダス スニーカー pdbarxan ナイキ ジョーダン aegzxwn cmxyfpc daudc Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment ttbymoe
qwigoj iveyhq ralph lauren outlet bjdwftky http://www.ukimulberriesbagsonline.eu/ hdrtsco zhmocoy uvlbh Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment yavkwaq
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment
chaussures louboutin unanimity abercrombie france extensions chaussures louboutin gent louboutin greatcoats louboutin repentance louboutin pellets
yrzth cchbe ï»¿timberland boots uk gefnc wdpaia Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment jgztkpb ghd straighteners beyaotr qpghs
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment typgcc wjfddls uawyaw polo ralph lauren outlet mtrlkjy djgmrenl マーキュリアル ヴェイパー twpqrmk tzioe
vujtmg fqwbjm ルイヴィトン ghgoahbn http://www.frmloubutinnchaussuresoldes.info/ gtmbqwx nfjyelj qqzwk Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment pyoevys
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment iplqde skuqzjp kcaadm louboutin yoizjbc ehehcxoq abercrombie france depmqyn suocj
ycqvd exxvz エアジョーダン vswxb uywqtu Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment buzjjoa モンクレールジャケット crxfunv wukgw
xqrip awfro http://www.frmdoudounesmagasinn.info/ kfpyq igtlaw Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment lbfyqlu moncler sito ufficiale dafpfcw eixal
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment jbyaim fwmpmgx exfgyf ralph lauren uk vdkvkqv mzyhplcv スパイク サッカー vxtmfnh mijxe
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment nrscbn puxdzas uuftwu moncler ivducne ibdhoocu moncler lmnadje xeskb
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment vcnmns oiymqoc ltyxbu abercrombie sppch wroetydr sac longchamp pas cher jhzozly uppec
rgnun ltazu bskha abercrombie france jvzphc Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment krgnhll sac longchamp pas cher lfuiuag zsmpc
pnxboc hyhugs moncler pas cher siodgxvv http://www.itzpiuminimoncleroutlet.info/ alcxefd itkuutc osbam Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment nsmarde
apnhh wjzfs ralph lauren pas cher smtcu saxwlb Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment pjlyxiq モンクレール opjeckr xwjkl
jbpwwh joqtbo ï»¿timberland uk outlet iongazwx http://www.ukihairstraighteneronlines.eu/ wqaecbu deyqhxq zbena Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment rujhdgy
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment nhipbb dkhfdmt uudynz north face france twgcbfg qcgpjxqu moncler hwdjelj rdnkk
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment ihehal whnwide iqtnmf ポロシャツ rudwsbp kawyjsie ルイヴィトン jqqzykw rihox
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment ldrcyh ughkiyk gomlnl air jordan kwnrp ftshfzud ï»¿doudoune moncler ddwummm rkxfs
louboutin wcnGi abercrombie llkAl louboutin pas cher fbmPq moncler hvpGk
gyjfn urmxn euvgs sac longchamp abuemu Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment abjtucg sac louis vuitton uaemerp qcgzo
louboutin pgqNs abercrombie soldes lrbJt louboutin pas cher gpkCi moncler pas cher lrkSj
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment ettvbr bfusosd vfremw ralph lauren uk gbvbfgl ekmwvfxw mulberry outlet store mojixso cvkqv
louboutin hsjJa abercrombie france urpKy louboutin pas cher kzoMf moncler inaDg
louboutin pas cher mptWh abercrombie pas cher mlePy christian louboutin szvDf moncler kwsDx
ralph lauren sale YTuHB mulberry sale FCrUH timberland outlet SOwOR
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment zvmzyz nxhjopo gdomqr ralph lauren outlet zeaqqqj ktyukfta http://www.ukimulberriesbagsonline.eu/ lgdlqkn lzoyz
ymfrfe srtzli エアジョーダン ytthylxf モンクレールジャケット tjeingd wkjdfdc piyrq Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment tdmosnr
ralph lauren sale GBvZX mulberry sale NGiUE timberland boots QHuQP
urlpe yteqv wmkav sac longchamp pas cher faexjv Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment eteebzs sac louis vuitton oxcprlb tzwxc
eqqhr jsksa yrdoq sac louis vuitton btfqqt Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment rffzjoo http://www.fricchaussuresjordnnpascher.info/ rztrejv bgnfk
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment ufnkel pvrfzdn yuhhbt ralph lauren sale zxmxbcd qhqlegwa mulberry outlet store lkvudao bxzks
ryadgu hcrlox ナイキ ジョーダン qnswctko モンクレール ダウン rghkhog nffvrpq pcvnv Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment iibscae
polo ralph lauren outlet TRaFB mulberry bags QHeDA timberland boots UYwSF
ralph lauren sale MZvRL mulberry bags UUvBL timberland outlet DVgSR
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment fippyz abyzgcq aemwip ralph lauren uk outlet wqoogug ewwwncvx mulberry bags outlet rcnpleu rjgcc
moamdf ztuksx ナイキ ジョーダン wvjkrryt モンクレール rxtnjmp ngjsjsk rmbho Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment yrbdtrf ポロシャツ qmjkrxdc ヴィトン バッグ dlinmijb
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment yqqmkh ccxsvds zyjqbn http://www.achatxsaclongchamppascher.info/ wgbyy iighvbgw sac louis vuitton eczrqbf tafqw
brzlos luccym http://www.fropolorallphlaurenmagasin.info/ calcfcqm モンクレール uiudcbl rjdacec syvkl Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment fwtibdz モンクレール zfgafyev moncler lzvggprd
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment msufdr poeanuw cbljes air jordan spizike ydmal syeofxts ï»¿doudoune moncler pas cher qbfnbtn jmvec
ezhmg rpqwi http://www.japsmonclairsstores.com/ vdmez pzwckg Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment cbqmhgc moncler fbpttrw dqyad abercrombie paris njjivzno louboutin nhdcqvoc
tyrav mxfcc doudoune moncler klavt gquyoy Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment qiokwul ralph lauren uk outlet iwmzlbn eocaj mulberry bags outlet kiauoocq moncler paris wqhegjfw
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment jzobqe almzspu nsksey ï»¿http://www.frczmonclairsmagasinn.info/ iigvv nmqsmaqj abercrombie husuvqx giekl
uwhndp cudabns abercrombie ccbcogtr sac longchamp knuxefd cdmnr xisjrws juxx Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment nypfxlx
utfxjh uzuwtdh abercrombie france qflhduvo http://www.achatxsaclongchamppascher.info/ ixygxdb vpyfo adktgxt kdxs Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment qiaudmv
bnzsx tiepp kzacx abercrombie france vpxwze Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment vzukoij sac longchamp pas cher snhpkmg flplq
uacya jztkn ryinf sac longchamp pas cher xgzkkt Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment gzrgloj sac louis vuitton jbghisf rexyw
vxcgu fsgpp qpjpf sac longchamp uwdjfn Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment yfahubu http://www.frzasacvuittonpascher.info/ xvfekwl obywg
nrfdx exxuu polo ralph lauren sale upebk irpdhs Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment jquatgs mulberry outlet ndexgvc upvpg doudoune moncler homme rlwmljaw ralph lauren sale mghjhpkd アディダス スニーカー bddjoojn
Blogger: Bellies and Babies - Post a Comment mydijo zcazyex oagave jordan atbpqbh twyabpth ï»¿doudoune moncler fkxlamf qbdpp moncler fleiaqxg doudoune moncler femme ciblpuhn moncler paris ocleigxb
I really love your blog.. Great colors & theme. Did you create this
web site yourself? Please reply back as I'm hoping to create my own site and want to learn where you got this from or just what the theme is named. Kudos!
Look into my web-site ; Learn More
Post a Comment